Pathological Lying & ObamaCare-How One Begat the Other

Politicians lie, no shocker there, they’ve been doing it for eons, but the press is supposed to play a role here in keeping them in check and getting to the truth. In the case of the horribly misnamed Affordable Care Act, most of the mainstream media completely failed us. Nothing illustrates this more than the tortured and corrupt way the bill was debated and finally arm twisted in to being and the video below shows a key way in which this was accomplished

Healthcare policy expert and Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute Avik Roy provides three separate  incidents in this YouTube compilation of ObamCare architect and MIT professor Jonathan Gruber making his now infamous comments on the stupidity of the American people.  Several more videos of Mr. Gruber doing the same thing have also come out , bringing the total to 6 now of him preaching the virtues of dumb American voters in getting flawed policies passed in Washington.  His defense after the 1st video was that his comments were “off the cuff” and shouldn’t be taken seriously which he is still sticking to even  after videos 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 surfaced.

What a weasel. Honestly, I’d have maybe a tad of  respect for the man if he’d just own up to his statements and admit we were lied to from the very beginning, but it’s ok see, because it’s all for our own good, we are just too stupid to comprehend it all  Ends justify the means you know and omelettes require cracked eggs and all that jazz.

These videos highlight so perfectly the biggest problem we face with our political system today; the growing number of people in prominent positions who truly believe they know what’s best for us and will do and say whatever they can to pass horrid bills that are supposed to do great things.  Funnily enough that process always involves more power and control going to the politicians and their groupies at the expense of us yahoos forced to live the realities of said bills which always means more money from our pockets and less choices on how we can live. Side note, Mr. Gruber’s efforts as Chief Director of Lying has earned him a small fortune of at least $6million and counting.  Geeze, maybe we are the dumb ones.

The numbers for ObamaCare never worked but those crafting it didn’t care, at least not in the way you or I would. Some sense of morality would compel a person to be concerned that big important circles could not be squared and either work hard to make it so they could or just be honest on what the bill is; a giant wealth redistribution scheme coupled with a massive federal bureaucracy that will gobble up 1/6 of the economy and increasingly butt up against individual choice and needs.

Now some may argue this is not a bad thing as long as we get more people covered. And some may say yes, it is bad, there are better ways to do this that don’t involve forced subsidization of others and that allow us the freedom to navigate our own healthcare. But an honest and fair argument over one of the most significant piece of legislation in a century was not to be.

The ACA puts us firmly on a path towards nationalizing healthcare, something many on the left have wanted enacted for years.  So instead of laying the truth out there, that you can’t insure millions of new people with loads of coverage mandates and no pre-existing condition limits without exploding premium costs and narrowing of choices, the people in charge just lied.  Hard, fast and often, that’s what they did and why not?  Their almost realized dream was in jeopardy and with a compliant media and a public desperate for premium relief, spinning the ObamaCare fairy tale seemed so much easier than fighting math.

They lied about prices going down, they lied about being able to keep your doctor (if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. Period.), they lied about how superior your new O’Care plan will be, they lied about how wonderful it is that people are being dumped in to Medicaid, they lied about how non disruptive it would be to those with existing plans, they lied about the bill not adding to the deficit, they lied about taxes not going up and they lied about all the new jobs that would be created.  My God they even lied about the most basic of things in promising to have the  bill negotiations broadcast live on C-SPAN.  Remember that?  How quaint it all sounds now.

Again, this is normal behavior, almost what we expect now of politicians.  The media however, outside of conservative outlets, ate it up like a child being spoon fed ice cream.  They took people like Jonathan Gruber at his word and rarely offered intelligent analysis from the other side from folks like Avik Roy mentioned above, or the Heritage Society or the American Enterprise Institute all of whom have done extensive studies on the ACA and its effects.  In fact when Melissa Francis from CNBC (she is now with FOX) actually did some honest reporting on the numbers, she was harshly disciplined by her management for “not respecting the office of the President.”

Even worse, when those of us with concerns pointed out the bills obvious faults, we were accused of not wanting poor people to have insurance. Politicians encouraged this, pushing a good vs evil narrative with themselves of course being on the side of angels, fighting those mean, racist Republicans who would rather see sick women and children dying in the streets than pass this bill.  The more the hyperbole and demagoguery grew, the more divided the country became and the chance for any type of intelligent debate dissolved in to the ensuing drama.

Jonathan Gruber did us all a favor by bringing to life a perfect example of the condescending, elitist policy maker, sent straight from central casting.  And it was not those of us on the right who his words were aimed at by the way, as we knew from the beginning the bill was a clunker. Those on the far left either were not his targets as they were going to support it no matter what.  It was the middle of the roaders, smart people who maybe don’t pay too much attention to politics and who vote both Republican and Democrat at times.  The ugly truths coming to light now would have turned off a lot of those voters and so people like Gruber were needed to create false narratives about the bill which, in his own words, relied on a “lack of transparency” and the “stupidity of the American voter” in order for it to pass.

I don’t think most voters in this case were stupid. I do believe many of them wanted so much for the bill would work that listening to Gruber touting the miracle making wonders of it sealed the deal for them. That and some predefined narratives they probably had about those opposing the bill.   I write more about that here.

Insulted is not strong enough a word for how I would feel if that were me.

This entry was posted in Political and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Pathological Lying & ObamaCare-How One Begat the Other

  1. Thanks for following Envisioning the American Dream- I look forward to reading your posts


  2. Tricia says:

    You’re welcome and thanks for the return follow. You’ve got an interesting blog and I look forward as well to more of your posts.


  3. Jack Sutter says:

    I’m a fairly amoral person and even I was angry the Affordable Care Act passed. I happen to be on the low end when it comes to income, for the time being, but I don’t *want* tax-payer money paying for my medical care. Real health care reform would have targeted the outrageous prices hospitals and doctors charge for even the most basic stuff (e.g. $200 per pill for aspirin when my great-grandfather was in the hospital recovering from knee surgery), and hospital insistence that people in need of medical care have health insurance would have been looked at and removed from the equation. I don’t have a problem with being in debt to a hospital if I end up needing treatment (emergency or otherwise), but that option isn’t available to me or anyone else who would rather not toss a few hundred bucks away every month on insurance I’d almost never use.

    Hospitals, short of full-blown life-threatening emergencies, won’t treat someone like me most of the time simply because of a lack of insurance. And even then, as I understand it, all they’re legally obligated to do is stabilize me. If I die a few days later anyways that’s okay because legally, they did all they were legally obligated to. I’d prefer me being in debt to being dead but even before the Affordable Care Act, that just wasn’t (and isn’t) they way it works.

    With the act in place, people not being able to afford the jacked up insurance prices, and hospitals still insisting people have insurance (and prove it before they’re even looked at, even for serious conditions or injuries), it’s even worse. Which is kind of sick. But going back to where I started, even as a fairly amoral person it comes down to this: the Affordable Care Act is hurting people, it is preventing them from buying the insurance they could previously afford and making it even harder to get for people who could’t afford it in the first place. Furthermore, and more significant to the amoral, is that it even hurts the insurance companies aren’t buying, the influx of predicted new customers isn’t coming, because people simply *can not* afford it.

    It’s even hurting the damned insurance companies! So on the individual level it’s damaging, harmful, and on the corporate level it’s damaging, costly. It hurts our economy on both levels. You would think even a sociopath would see the flaws there, in terms of efficiency and economic viability at the very least. No matter which angle you look at it from…

    It just doesn’t work, whether you look at it from a moral standpoint or a completely amoral one.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Tricia says:

      Hey Jack thanks for your thoughtful comment and sorry it took so long for me to respond as WP didn’t notify me of it until today. Put that down as another thing that’s not working right. 😉

      And you’re absolutely right, the ACA is immoral, even more so I would argue the way the people that forced it upon us present it as being helpful to the poor and needy when really it just benefits them by giving the govt more power over us.

      There are so many ays we could have addressed the old system which was not really a market based on either which people forget. Reasonable people can certainly have reasonable differences on what those solutions could be but certainly the atrocious bureaucracy and govt enforced mandates of the ACA were and still are not the way to go. Hopefully it’s not too late to reboot.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Pingback: Does Society Still Value Freedom? | Freedom Through Empowerment

Respectful comments always welcome.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s